<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Websites of Rival Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/</link>
	<description>Web copywriting, SEO and the Web at large</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18238</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this post forward, Rick! What about something similar on the web copy writing front. Then any web writer or website designer can use it for quick reference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this post forward, Rick! What about something similar on the web copy writing front. Then any web writer or website designer can use it for quick reference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18229</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18229</guid>
		<description>Apple is the king of brands. That&#039;s how they get away with such huge mark-ups :)

The Gibson site was impressive as well. The others weren&#039;t totally terrible. It&#039;s just that their competitors didn&#039;t see things through. 

Look at Microsoft&#039;s brand...all that money and resources and they don&#039;t come close...I guess it comes down to the cliche: money can&#039;t buy good taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is the king of brands. That&#8217;s how they get away with such huge mark-ups :)</p>
<p>The Gibson site was impressive as well. The others weren&#8217;t totally terrible. It&#8217;s just that their competitors didn&#8217;t see things through. </p>
<p>Look at Microsoft&#8217;s brand&#8230;all that money and resources and they don&#8217;t come close&#8230;I guess it comes down to the cliche: money can&#8217;t buy good taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18227</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webcopyplus.com/2009/04/18/comparing-websites-of-rival-companies/#comment-18227</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about branding! Make noise and don&#039;t be heard, or get your sole message out and you will be received. I agree that it&#039;s MUCH more work to achieve simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about branding! Make noise and don&#8217;t be heard, or get your sole message out and you will be received. I agree that it&#8217;s MUCH more work to achieve simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
